While many of us thought the Google-supported DMOZ website directory was slowly fading into insignificance in the SEO world, the folks at DMOZ begged to differ. First off, the release date behind DMOZ 2.0 has changed so often, that we have no sure fire release date for you as of this writing.
You'll first want to note that while Google reportedly uses DMOZ data, AOL is the search engine driving the DMOZ engine. So keep an eye on them for news as well. The new DMOZ 2.0 will reportedly get a facelift (slicker looking website), will have its data structure reorganized, and will make it easier to find things you're looking for. Look for gadgets and Web 2.0 elements to make you're DMOZ search more useful and relevant.
Right now, DMOZ is a static directory of links and descriptions. The new DMOZ 2.0 will have all kinds of interactivity built in, with tie ins to real-time content updates and news. Will this be the boost that AOL search needed? Stay tuned to Guru of Search for updates.
First, let's begin with what a directory is. Web-based directories were initially created to help organize the information on the Internet. They would group websites into various categories, ranging from arts to sports. There's tons of directories on the Internet, but many of them are unreliable, not kept up, or they require payment, which defeats the whole purpose of having a directory, as quality sites not willing to pay won't be found in it.
The DMOZ directory at dmoz.org attempted to do away with all this by establishing a human-edited directory, functioning in a fashion similar to today's Wikipedia (Wikipedia is more than a directory - it's an online encyclopedia that adds new content to its various definitions and categories all the time as users volunteer to edit and maintain pages - within specified guidelines). The purpose of DMOZ was to gather together only the best sites. You could (and still can) submit your site to DMOZ by visiting the directory itself, and browsing its various categories until you found one that fit the topic of your website. You would then fill out a submission form, providing details for your website such as name, description, and a contact email address, and your submission request would be submitted to the editor in charge of the DMOZ category you submitted your website to. This sounds fine, but why the big deal for search?
Before the turn of the century, DMOZ was highly touted by Google and other search engines. They would harvest information and links to websites directly from the "Open Directory" and list them in their search results. For website owners, this meant a listing in DMOZ was a huge plus in getting your site listed higher in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages). How did Google do this? It created its own directory.
In 2000 Google decided to create its own directory, the Google Directory. It would use DMOZ as the source, and then organize all the websites by PageRank (read how do search engines find my website? for an explanation of PageRank). An entry in the Google directory was paramount to a successful search marketing campaign. But nearly a decade later, is that still the case?
DMOZ, while a novel and useful concept, is still prone to human error. And as it has grown over the years and the ratio of website submissions to editors that can approve the submissions has grown, the quality of the directory has come in question. In particular, if you look at the Alexa graph of visitors to dmoz.org, you'll notice the downward trend, just over the past year (select "max" for the graph range to see a full year back). The downward trend has continued for several years, which means fewer and fewer people actually make use of the site. Had you heard of it before reading this article? Had you ever made use of it to find a website of interest? There's always been plenty of people ready to submit their websites, but the purpose of the directory is muted when no ones uses it to actually find anything. Notice on the Alexa page that only 16% of visitors visit the search portion of the directory - ie. search for a website.
Google and other prominent search engines such as Yahoo and MSN ("Live") are constantly updating their search algorithms to make searching more efficient and beneficial to the searchers. One rule that has always stood paramount over the others in the search community, and now is playing a larger role than ever, is the fact that content is king. No matter how much or well content is marketed, and no matter how many tactics or tricks website owners use to get their content indexed, the bottom line is that the searcher is looking for quality content. If you have that, and you update it regularly, you will be found.
All Content © 2007 - 2010 Contract Web Development, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Powered by Drupal
DMOZ 2.0
I'm also interested in the upcoming rumored release of DMOZ 2.0. When I first heard about this, I was surprised. I thought DMOZ was slowly but surely fading into oblivion.
So my question is - does anyone here at Guru of Search have some news as far as DMOZ 2.0 is concerned? When will it be released. Why is it being released? And should we even be concerned?
DMOZ 2.0 News
Thanks to all those asking for DMOZ 2.0 news. We've updated the article above with the latest news we have on the DMOZ 2.0 release.
DMOZ2.0
Do you have any news about DMOZ 2.0 ?
I also support DOMZ as it's
I also support DOMZ as it's a great resource directory and I think we specially need it in SEO. Sure things can take different turns in internet marketing but the basic lines always remain the same and I really thing DOMZ is one of those basic lines.
Gerrard
From a DMOZ editor
I would like to thank you for your sincere efforts. I have been a DMOZ editor since 2005 and in that time I've made 10's of thousands of edits. Editing in DMOZ is a largely thankless job, and disheartening when you read about the ground-swell of animosity towards the project.
In some ways, it is well deserved, but SEO's need to remember that this project is run by volunteers - if you don't want to wait to be approved, sign up and help out! Volunteer in a small, non-commercial category, like your local area.
Well said
Much respect goes out to you, other DMOZ editors, and other "volunteer" editors such as those working on Wikipedia pages. We here at Guru of Search would like to thank you for all the time you've invested. Time investments such as those made by yourself are ultimately what's needed to help put the whole initiative on the right track.
Thank you!
- Guru of Search team
I remember a time when there
I remember a time when there wasn't such thing as website optimization without listing the site in DMOZ. Those were the good old days!
I certainly think dmoz still has relevance
Or at least I hope so. It's a trusted site and very well thought of in the SEO community. I had heard of it purely by word of mouth and darn good reviews. Although the stats may suggest otherwise you have to consider it was the first of its kind back then and there is a heck of a lot more people using the Internet today.
It's true that all these new directories have diluted the market and there is now more selection. But what have you got to lose by using dmoz? If it's good enough for Google - then it's good enough for me. Dmoz is huge, free, and reliable. And it's helping our websites.
Google takes over all!
Dmoz is actually the source of information for all of us. Google took over each and everything on the net. Whether you find educational websites or are trying to master chess and looking for a chess opening strategy, Google provides you with everything.